[MadMaxy]

Hi everyone!

Does anyone know about a pick (tips) service which never had a losing month and for a month the fee is not more than $300?

I'm thinking about minimum the last 2 years (24 months) and the service to be verifiable by their honest records and if possible other independent observers.

Thanks,

Maxy

PS: I put $300 because IMO nobody in their right mind should pay more than this amount per month for some picks, even if they are very good.

[kingmod]

www.toutbuster.com has gone without losing for more than a month. there tips are currently monitored by bettingadvice surveillance teama and here at talkgold. however, they are not listed in the approved list because the monitoring must go on for atleast 3 months before they get approved status.

[MadMaxy]

Thanks kingmod, I'm curious how they will come out after these 3 months of trial....

Nobody else with non-losing services?

[OnlineInvests]

Originally Posted by MadMaxy

Thanks kingmod, I'm curious how they will come out after these 3 months of trial....

Nobody else with non-losing services?

If you can find a tipster that have not had a losing month in the last 24 month, its either a scammer or someone who can predict the future.

I'm online since 1996 and i have never come across an honest tipster who had 24 month in a row with positive result. It's hard to do.

If i remember, Kingmod has once said that 98% of all the tipsters on the net are either scam or not good enough to subtain a long term profit.

Here's my motto: Don't bet...trade or dutch. It's more profitable in long term and less risky.

Good luck in your quest for a tipster who has never had a losing month. You won't find any.

[MadMaxy]

Originally Posted by OnlineInvests

If you can find a tipster that have not had a losing month in the last 24 month, its either a scammer or someone who can predict the future.

I'm online since 1996 and i have never come across an honest tipster who had 24 month in a row with positive result. It's hard to do.

If i remember, Kingmod has once said that 98% of all the tipsters on the net are either scam or not good enough to subtain a long term profit.

Here's my motto: Don't bet...trade or dutch. It's more profitable in long term and less risky.

Good luck in your quest for a tipster who has never had a losing month. You won't find any.

I do not hope to find any real tipster without a losing month, because I know a lot about sports betting.
I started the thread more from curiosity than to discover a real tipster who has never had a negative month, to see what folks will post.
And of course, Kingmod is 100% right...

But I do not agree with what you say that trading is more profitable or less risky than sports betting done the right way.
And yes, there are numerous real handicappers who are profitable in the long run, even if they can have even 2, 3 losing months in a row, or a total losing season on some sport (but then generally they make it up from the other sports they cap).

I am talking here about American services who have picks on all American sports, not just one.
I can't talk about European services (they are 99% on soccer or horses) because I never seriously analyzed or used them.

[loud]

yeah that's it... and real punters go into for really big money so even 10 points profit per month can easily give they full time income ..and 10 point profit per month can give a lot of systems - the main problem is that we want to get like 100 or more points and we immediatly put down this system if it can't make such profit

[Sinbaddy]

Originally Posted by kingmod

www.toutbuster.com has gone without losing for more than a month. there tips are currently monitored by bettingadvice surveillance teama and here at talkgold.

I can't see what you're basing that on. What date did you start proofing their tips?

[horseracingman]

Look at racing-index tipster comparison chart, maybe you can find some there, but that is only horse racing.

I think it is a very bad way to measure a tipster service. It is very possible to have 24 months with out a losing month if you are only having very few selections. Would rather look at return on investment and how many selections so I can see if it could be pure luck, or if it seems to be valid :-.)