Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JackPop
There could be proof
pouring out of your monitor and you still would doubt what was there.
|
Might I point out, that 'proof' usually arrives LONG after it would have made a difference. And, the 'proof' that SHOULD matter to anyone involved, where 'profits' are ACTUALLY being made. is - non-existent. There IS a reason that it's NOT being shown, and that's because it's NOT happening.
Feel free to show me why that might not be the case, no 'proof' required.
(Guess why it's not a 'registered' security?)
By the way, has anyone in the 'program' suggested that it's NOT a good idea to use the term 'investment' - yet?
Just my opinion,
Jeff
***edited by awty***
I know W. Louden only ended up with a year for 'unregistered securities'. At one point, Blake Prater was looking at a possible 225 years or so. I never followed up on what he actually ended up getting... At many times, I have seriously considered becoming an 'admin' of a program. However, I happen to believe there are BETTER ways of getting profits, and most of those have merely financial risk (NOT legal ones) involved, but that's another discussion...
---The GINS guys been released yet? Marsden been to court yet, or him and his wife still sitting in jail waiting? The 'swisscash' guys been to court yet? That one I find interesting, as it involved a Mareva injunction, I haven't been watching it. 'Danny Jacobs' already did his time, and looks like Greg McKnight will likely be doing time as well (Legisi). CEP is interesting, as some of those 'in profit' - well, again, it doesn't hurt to do some research... (Nevermind on that, I may be getting parts of CEP and Legisi confused - I've seen SO many of these things over time, I have a tendency to get 'em mixed up at times...)
Guess I forgot to add - while I haven't verified it, I've read that 'participants' in China have been 'executed' for their involvement in some of these schemes.
I'm NOT posting this to scare anybody. I happen to think that it's better to be more informed and educated with financial dealings. Just want to point out that while many may say yes, there IS a risk involved with these beasts, but I think it might help to be aware that 'risk' can be more than just financial losses.
And, when I say that it's possible to 'sue your referrer' for any losses, that HAS happened, as well...
PLEASE, point out ANYWHERE that I'm wrong...