Regardless of some of the concerns, as long as I don't have access to the $10,000+ programmes secretly out there, the risk of investing in FXIG is still very low compared to some of the nasty stuff available... as always, spread the risk. Or, my motto: "it pays to be paranoid". All those people investing into FXIG through FeederFund, spread your money inside FeederFund to other programmes as well. Look for other lowish risk programmes and spread into that as well. Never bet on one horse, not even if it is a pretty one like FeederFund or FXIG.
__________________ HansG:Just some HYIP dinosaur from a time and place long gone...
I don't have a problem with the explanation of the FXIG.com domain name. The details was indeed updated last month and it now has the same owner as Forexinvestmentgroup.com domain. So their story checks out in that regard.
It now has the same owner as Forexinvestmentgroup.com domain. So their story checks out in that regard.
That's just domainsbyproxy's adress, thousands of sites use it. I don't see any other similarity. It would have the same owner as 4x-club.com aswell, wich seems very unlikely.
What I meant is that there's no evidence to refute their story. If they registered one domain with DBP then it makes sense that both would be. I'm not saying DBP owns the program. Don't be stupid.
Yep hansG that is what FXIG told me, and I think they have posted this elsewhere. Now I am trying to check with feederfund whether they could verify FXIG's trading results or only that they had an account with a brocker as i-midas.com says. (which would be a lot less meaningful, so it would be a good find by i-midas.)
And we probably have to trust that feederfund and FXIG are not the same people I think I am prepared to do this at the moment. I'm not sure how that could really be tested anyway.
Best of luck EMU, I'm curious what you will be able to dig up. Sceptical as I am, I already diversify my FF money into ITS, Club4x and FXIG (not just FXIG) and I'm in the process of further diversifying the low-risk part of my portfolio with the addition of some private programmes. Even with a great programme like FF around we still need to be insanely paranoid and not just rely on FF as the stable element
__________________ HansG:Just some HYIP dinosaur from a time and place long gone...
Yep hansG that is what FXIG told me, and I think they have posted this elsewhere. Now I am trying to check with feederfund whether they could verify FXIG's trading results or only that they had an account with a brocker as i-midas.com says. (which would be a lot less meaningful, so it would be a good find by i-midas.)
This is what FF admin said when he introduced FXIG.
Quote:
We have spoken to the principal brokers and viewed their reports showing multi-million dollar margin accounts and significant profits. Our view is that FXIG presents a negligible fraud risk.
And later on I remember someone who posted an email from FF admin when he asked if FF had really seen actual trades. FF admin responded that he only was able to confirm they had trading accounts at the broker but was not able to see any live trading reports.
Just ask FXIG if you invest 100k with them, if they will accept to show you their trading reports. They will say no.
Or just ask them if their trader could manage a 500k account for you and give 60% of the monthly profit to the trader. That's a 60k paycheck NET for the trader MONTHLY. They will say no. Tell me, what trader in the world would refuse that.
__________________
Early to bed, early to rise...until you get enough money to do otherwise.
Re: FXIG new domain name explained
I think I am prepared to do this at the moment. I'm not sure how that could really be tested anyway.
Hybrid Mode
