HYIP with 5% a month, would you invest?

[Nick0016]

Hi all,

I trade the forex market and make on average ~10-15% a month. Lately I have been asked to start a "HYIP" so people could easily invest.
Been thinking about it and deducting all costs I can give 5% a month.

Besides all the work to get it running I am more wondering if people would even join when they get 5% a month from their investment.

Would you join?!

Note: I am not talking here on a sponzi scheme, the money will be invested for real (can proof it)...

[FOREXSIGNAL]

5% monthly is good return

[andy83]

if you will show all you pays and saty for long i'm sure many willl join, but it will take you time to earn investors trust because no one will invest 10$ in such hyip unlike the regular daily ones

[donald236]

i would only if you could prove that you would stay for the long haul . im not talking just a few months , im talking about staying for some years

[andy83]

many will stay with you,but you need to gaurantee investors to stay for long time

[michelcarry100]

I want to invest.can you give me proof?

[aniket]

If you give me guaranty for long period you stay. I will invest. Can you provide how to join.

[Nick0016]

I can show trading proof without a problem.

Working on the site at the moment, it has the "invest system" and forum integrated together.

I am not allowed to advertise here but you can always PM me if you are interested.

thx all so far with your answers!

[calco]

I think for hyips where people seek for higher returns, 5% is good enough. If you want to start a site to offer investors to invest with you and get returns, then don't label it hyip and never launch it here. Start a non-hyip investment site like I see one similar site.

People who don't know about hyips and looking to invest can find your site interest as you are offering 5% per month.

Just my idea.

Calco

[coolhan]

With confidence I can generate the ROI of 5% per month in a week, through trading on the sports market, I can show proof of my Skill set,before you cast any sort of judgment in regards to the creditability of sports betting, Lets compare sports betting and stock trading the difference between the traditional gambler and the non traditional gambler (investor.) Be it sports betting, stock market, playing poker or any sort of gambling, the traditional gambler will be a long term loser because they gamble without edge and proper money management. These traditional bettors are usually degenerates, problem gamblers or "action junkies." A non traditional gambler (an investor) on the other hand is someone who only gambles (invests) with an edge and proper money management for long term success.

Sports betting attracts many traditional gamblers because of its simple nature and as a result traditional gamblers (long term losers) out number investors (long term winners.) Stock market on the other hand rarely attracts any traditional gamblers because of its complex structure and as a result investors out number traditional gamblers. We know that investors are long term winners relative to traditional gamblers who are losers. And that is exactly why many consider sports betting as gambling (high risk investment) and stock trading as investing (low risk gamble).

But if you look at sports betting and stock trading in terms of investors perspective only, sports betting is a much safer play because it is easy to manage, cheaper in the vig (commission) and much cheaper in the bankroll. Both are a form of gambling and the kicker with both is same--in order to be successful you need to be skillful, especially with money management AND finding the edge.

Sports betting is much easier to manage because most of the variables and information are publicly available and all you have to do is analyze everything to find the edge. Stock market on the other hand is more complex--monitoring the performance of companies is much harder than monitoring sports teams. There are too many unknown variables in the stock market that could affect the performance of your stocks. Often, these variables are not available to the public immediately and because of this it is really difficult to gain an edge unless you are an insider in the company or stock market. Insider trading is illegal but it is much more common than match fixing in sports betting.



Therefore, contrary to the popular belief, sports betting is a much safer play than stock market if you approach it with an investors perspective. However, sports investing and stock investing are viewed differently by government regulators. Governments around the globe encourage stock wagering, a nice respectable occupation in the eyes of most. Sports bettors, on the other hand, are shunned. They do not wear suits and ties. And in many cases, sports investors do not enjoy the support of the general public or the government regulatory bodies. Why? Taxes! We could write a whole new article on this topic but for now let us just state the fact that it is much easier for the government to milk taxes from stock investors than sports investors.


When you read about someone who loses money in the stock market they are always described as an investor who had some bad luck. When someone loses all their money betting on sports they are described as a degenerate who valued their addiction over their family. When you go to trade a stock you deal with a reputable company who helps you make an investment in your future. When you bet on sports you deal with a bookie named Johnny the Guido. When you earn money in the stock market you are described as a savvy investor and when you make a lot of money in the stock market you are the envy of your peers. When you make money gambling on sports you are still a degenerate on a lucky streak and when you make a ton of money betting on sports people say, ***8220;yeah, he may have a lot of money but how does he tell his kids what he does.