It's More Entertaining Each Time!

[Bomber]

Originally Posted by dogman

Call me a twit. It's you who is the twit. DId you see Return of the Jedi?? The second deathstar was never completed. The second one was never completely built. Yes, both were operational and able to destroy whole planets, but the second one could only destroy Endor because it couldn't fly yet.

Dogman you truly are unique... you said the deathstar was never completed yet now you are saying the second one never was??? What the? I am guessing the reason that the second death star was not completed is because it was destroyed maybe? This argument of yours is ridiculous... why can't you ever let anything go and just admit you are wrong rather than make a bigger fool of yourself everytime?

Also, you claim that I am wrong most of the time yet when I challenge you on this you are unable to come up with anything... I have done this several times with you and shown you how between 70 to 90% of what you post at any given time is dead wrong yet you have not been able to find one such example from my posts... why is that Dogman?

Brunite: Please do not worry yourself about the problems I have with Dogman as percieved by you. I don't put him on ignore because I choose not to, you do not need to be concerned about me and responses as you yourself are not duty-bound to me unless that is in your 36 principles of course...

Regards, Dave

[dogman]

Originally Posted by dogman

And we all know what happened to that Death Star! It was never finished. DB seems to forget that little fact.

Oh, sorry, I didn't realize that you think DB meant the Death Star in the ACTUAL MOVIE STAR WARS. And not the second one. Silly me. Who cares, Bomber. But then that Death STAR WAS COMPLETED, and Dx still isn't completed after 6 years.

Enough of this nonsense. DB's example was pure crap to begin with no matter how you try to slice it or claim what he was saying. It doesn't matter if it is the first of second eeath star.

And at least they BOTH worked, Bomber, unlike Dx. It was DB who brought up this ridiculous example, Bomber. I'm simply pointing out how ridiculous it is. We should let this nonsense go without comment???

[KoolAidMan]

Originally Posted by ArizonaInvestor

Wait.....you mean that this recent morph into DXSynergy is not the full release?
When it is finished it willl destroy planets then?
It is still in beta?????

Originally Posted by Bomber

Dogman you truly are unique... you said the deathstar was never completed yet now you are saying the second one never was??? What the? I am guessing the reason that the second death star was not completed is because it was destroyed maybe? This argument of yours is ridiculous...

Let me try and explain this as there seems to be some confusion here...

The first death death star was fully constructed and operational, but it had a major design flaw that aloud it to be easily destroyed by a small rebel fleet. The First death star was like the so called "full production" DXInone scheme. DXInone had a major design flaw and it was easily destroyed by a relatively small bunch of "greedy" users. It was then simply labeled a beta test. It was then announced that a new and improved, more powerful "Death Star" called DXSynergy was going to be launched and fully operational "in the coming few weeks".

Like in The Empire Strikes Back" and "return of the Jedi" This second was way behind schedule, just like the so called "full production" DXSynergy scam. At the very end of "Return of the Jedi" The second Death Stars planet destroying weapon was finally operational, but the death star it's self was still far from complete and had massive holes all over it. It was quickly destroyed once again. Just like the DXSynergy scheme.

Does that clear things up at all?

"When it is finished it willl destroy planets then?"
If DX were to become a global economy, like DB and Cheeta claim, then it quit possibly could in a way. For now, It can only blow a hole in you savings account...

[Brunite]

Originally Posted by Bomber

.... you do not need to be concerned about me and responses as you yourself are not duty-bound to me unless that is in your 36 principles of course...

Well......Principle# 27 does state in part:

".....and in addition, assume the duty-bound position to help any and all self-deluded individuals, those with other delusions of grandeur and any with narcisistic tendencies, as this will help make life more bearable for those who have to deal with them"

So.....I really have no choice; you see?