Pathway-2-prosperity - Pathway-2-prosperity.net

[Tdinoz]

surprised its not more OW spam

[Abrasax]

Originally Posted by ToughLuck

Well, yes I would expect them to do that, that is if they do anything other than pay lip service to being anti-scam whilst basking in the glory of being the present flavour of the month so-called scambuster.

lol So people like hearing themselves talk and bask in their glory, big deal. The information in the posts is useful and that's all that should matter for an internet forum.

Originally Posted by ToughLuck

Or in the case of TG putting their name to the opening post of threads like this one whilst having a lame not-worth-the-paper-it-is-written-on disclaimer at the bottom. All in the name of money.

The disclaimers are usually to protect the one who is making the disclaimers, I wouldn't expect it to do anything else.

I'm not sure I understand your problem with "TG putting their name to the opening post". The opening post is obviously to start the discussion thread which what you would expect an administrator of a forum to do - to start the discussion.

The reflink in the p2p text ad itself in this thread is hyipranks.

[Abrasax]

Originally Posted by ToughLuck

Alternative to what? TG? Regarding the dingbats, I subscribe to the "they ask for all they get" school of thought rather than being a member of the "poor victims bleeding heart brigade". I am afraid I could not nor would not attempt to divert them from their search for their personal money tree. It would be rather futile, I fear.

In other words, you aren't doing a thing to stop scams but are somehow in a position to criticize those who do.

It is a fine position, no doubt. A risk free one since no one is perfect and there is always something to pick on.

Hi Everyone: Hey, what's up with this thread? Why is a closed scam program being discussed for over a year?

[ToughLuck]

Originally Posted by Finix

lol So people like hearing themselves talk and bask in their glory, big deal. The information in the posts is useful and that's all that should matter for an internet forum.

Useful to who? You have read where tdinoz says threads/posts therein are welcomed by scam admins and big-hitters? She knows, you know.

The disclaimers are usually to protect the one who is making the disclaimers, I wouldn't expect it to do anything else.

Exactly

I'm not sure I understand your problem with "TG putting their name to the opening post". The opening post is obviously to start the discussion thread which what you would expect an administrator of a forum to do - to start the discussion.

It reeks of hypocrisy to lend your name to a post inviting people to join an obvious scam and one in which the vast majority will lose money and then try to weasel your way out of accepting any responsibility later by adding at the end of the post that you do not vouch for any programmes.

The reflink in the p2p text ad itself in this thread is hyipranks.

Is that meant to make a point?

[ToughLuck]

Originally Posted by Finix

In other words, you aren't doing a thing to stop scams but are somehow in a position to criticize those who do.

It is a fine position, no doubt. A risk free one since no one is perfect and there is always something to pick on.

Yes I am in such a postion. Why shouldn't I be? Aren't you? S'funny I remember well you criticizing many a scambuster (so-called) including, I think, Ponzi Nemesis himself within the last day or two. Please correct me if I am wrong.

[Abrasax]

Hi Everyone: Hey, what's up with this thread? Why is a closed scam program being discussed for over a year?

Obviously because the ponzi being discussed is still operating.

It was put in the closed/scam section by an ex-moderator me222 evidently because he was having issues with his own p2p account.

[Abrasax]

Originally Posted by ToughLuck

Useful to who?

I would think to a significant portion of the TG members and some non-member readers.

You know, people who participate in HYIPs.

HYIP admins.

A few newbies who would not join the scene because of the info in the posts.

People who have a general interest in ponzies for whatever reason.

Etc.

[Abrasax]

Originally Posted by ToughLuck

It reeks of hypocrisy to lend your name to a post inviting people to join an obvious scam and one in which the vast majority will lose money and then try to weasel your way out of accepting any responsibility later by adding at the end of the post that you do not vouch for any programmes.

As I said, I wouldn't expect a disclaimer to do anything else other than to protect the TG.

TG survives on advertising programs like p2p and from what I see it makes no secret out of it.

Where is the hypocrisy exactly?

[Abrasax]

Originally Posted by ToughLuck

Yes I am in such a postion. Why shouldn't I be? Aren't you? S'funny I remember well you criticizing many a scambuster (so-called) including, I think, Ponzi Nemesis himself within the last day or two. Please correct me if I am wrong.

Sure I am.

But what would you have them do exactly if their goal is to help to stop some people from getting burned in those games?

Of course if everyone stopped posting on forums like TG it would be a better scambusting effort than anything else but it is not going to happen because scambusters do not seem to share similar goals.