[bensonmtkg]

We are rather outspoken about monitors and we stated that 95% of those so called rating sites do not provide any service at all. Do you think expressing our views in public could have a negative effect on our program in terms of bad votes, undermining remarks, ddos attacks and other Interferences?


I think that expressing your views in public is probably the best thing you could do in regards to this matter.

Reason being is if those monitors start trying to take you and you are quite it will end up looking bad for you.

Or if you waited till one of them tried something it might look like you have something to hide.

No one will fault you for having your doubts. I personally don't believe there needs to be hundreds of monitors on one site. I think just a few of the top and most respected monitors should be there.

The monitors that are well known and trusted is all you really need.

1643094

[emily2]

I think when your views are expressed politely and tactfully, a lot of us appreciate your honesty. Yes, it could lead to those bad things you mention in your question, but alert and caring members who visit forums and vote on monitors could help show those kind of things were contrived. Since you also have a PR person, they would probably be checking monitors and forums as well and could post the truth which would counteract the bad votes and remarks.

DDOS attacks would not affect the working of TTI since there is no back office, though it might at TTI Daily, except of course when new people go to the site and it's down. I don't know what the answer to that would be unless you decide to spend the large amount (I think it's large) to get DDOS protection.

I think short term, those bad things could have an effect, but in the long term, your continued timely payouts, and honesty, would overcome it. If I may also suggest, please keep seeking out the good monitors to use.

2432977

[retep]

Yes I think that could happen, thoise site who do not give anny server might hit back with negative rating for your investment, with a sultult that people who check those sites where to invest will not invest in toy company.

2067600

[spiffmonkey1]

I don't think its true that 95% of the monitors didn't provide any service.
i think monitors are trustful thats why ithink it isn't 95%.
Some votes could be fake though :/.
But thanks for expressing yourself in pubic so we know the truth.

4163430

[Greens44]

I NEVER base my investments on Monitor sites. Sure I take a look at Invest Daddy, but what really deteremines my decision is forum site votes. You can't go wrong when a person with 200 votes says its good, but then you have the potential of Mod's getting paid to give good votes.

4154047

[emily2]

Post # 13 is almost an exact copy and paste of my response (# 9) in this thread.
Why don't you try being original fabiushyip????

[IntInvgp]

Swimming against the current is always hard, but who said that the current is always going in the right direction? If something is not right, you just have to stand up and say it is not right. Sometimes this could be troublesome, sometimes you might draw some unwanted attention. Some people who don't like your attitude might try to prove you wrong. Going public is risky, but who wants to lead has to take the chance. You will have to expect some bad posts, some attacks from competition or maybe somebody who has no idea what is going on.
But at the end, if you are right, you will be able to prove yourself and thus get the respect of the customers. What is important is transparency in dealing with customers and other associated entities. By doing so, you will be able to take your place in the market. It may not be easy, but I believe this is the right way to do it.

e-gold: 3775344

[hshark]

I think some of monitor program was built not for the investor needs, but only for their profit. But there are some other monitor has a good facilities, this will helps the investor to choice their program. DDOS attacks could be avoided by using a good hosting server which had a protection to this kind of attack. Joining a good program will not gives negative effects to your program.

3518896

[info4autosurf]

I don't think that the 95% of them does not "give" anything, if 95% of those so called rating sites do not provide any service at all, now i want to know what service do you want to get from them. i think many investor will learn about some infomation from monitors also from popular forum, Whether true or not information.

in terms of bad votes, undermining remarks, ddos attacks and other Interferences, when one of them happened, i think the admin must immediately clarify the facts in public, let the investor learn about the facts and not hidden something as an honest admin.

4037856

[TTInvest]

Originally Posted by info4autosurf

I don't think that the 95% of them does not "give" anything, if 95% of those so called rating sites do not provide any service at all, now i want to know what service do you want to get from them. .

4037856

What service do we want? Have a look at our ratings page and pick
for example http://www.money-monitor.com
http://www.hyip-navigator.com/
http://www.hyipnews.com

As you can see you get a whole package with a lot of information.
Compare to the run of the mill rating sites which have a bunch of
banners or empty spaces where banners should go and a bunch
of programs listed and the list is maybe updated maybe not, plus
a few links that lead to "under construction"

Too many monitor admins get a gc ratings script, whip up a site,
send out emails to every program asking for listing/ads, maybe
go on a few boards and post some zero content stuff and hope
to make a killing, be the next navigator or goldhosting.
I think this is not service but an attempt to make a few bucks.


Lou (tti pr & support)