Explanation...

[Bomber]

Originally Posted by GoldenNugget

Your observation makes perfect sense and fits so well with the timetable of events.

It could then be called a "Tri-incidence?"

GN

Spot on GN... you could probably throw another couple in there also... DXGC registration is coming up... a 'Quad-incidence'?

The realisation that their promises regarding DXGC profit projections might have finally registered with them that there will be quite a few of the most faithful very pissed off when they discover that they are all down around 5k each from this opportunity.

Regards, Dave

[GoldenNugget]

Originally Posted by Bomber

Spot on GN... you could probably throw another couple in there also... DXGC registration is coming up... a 'Quad-incidence'?

Omigosh ...it is about that time again, isn't it? For the DXGlobal Companies to renew?

I can't wait to see how GDT plays this all to the user base! I expect a little more heavy-handedness, just to remind who's the boss. Maybe a little thrashing about of those expecting big things from the Portfolio ...their impatience and greed to cash out gains causes the downfall of DXSynergy. But, alas, Federal-Gold is unaffected and thus the only system to further carry the banner.

Probably as many possible scenarios as there are attendees at this opera in which we wait breathlessly for the "fat lady" to take the stage.

GN

[littleroundman]

Originally Posted by KAM

Am I crazy for labeling this an analogy... Anybody? Did this clarify Bombers belief that DX can operate like a ponzi but not actually be a ponzi to anyone? Am I just dim? Help.

The problem here is that anyone who has observed this "scene" for more than five minutes immediately recognizes the "it isn't a ponzi because......." or "DX can operate like a ponzi but not actually be a ponzi " arguments for what they are - diversions, distractions and pointless.

"Ponzi" is a generic term.

It may be used in official press releases, newspaper headlines or online forums, but it certainly isn't used in SEC complaints, FBI prosecutions or USPS mail fraud investigations.

Think more along the lines of fraud, unlicensed operation, unregistered transactions, lack of disclosure, lack of records, misrepresentation of material facts, violation of Securities Acts, conspiracy etc, etc.

Just as night follows day, the stoppage of payment is invariably followed by endless, "apologist" driven debate about whether the fraud du jour does or does not qualify as a ponzi.

And just as certainly, the word ponzi doesn't figure in the eventual prosecutions.

[GoldenNugget]

Originally Posted by artificial HYIP

:
And which such multi-gazillion dollar backed enterprise wouldn't use GoDaddy hosting as a backup? I mean, they have some pretty good deals there. In fact, they're just about the right budget when you want to keep the appearance that your domain and site are still alive while the hard drives with the real data are being dissolved in acid.

That did hook me, though ...Federal-Gold and Mewantem on "Go Daddy" with over 3 million other domains ...but DXSynergy.com all by itself on a server with a different host ...from which they should be able to run it!

And what's with - "...now that we have finally achieved the commercial target we have been aiming for for so long" ?? What market have they "achieved" recently that they've been "aiming for for so long" ?? Auctions? They've barely touched it!

Or ...Federal-Gold - my personal vote for what they've really been "aiming for for so long" ?

GN

[Sterna]

Federal-Gold - my personal vote for what they've really been "aiming for for so long" ?

They should have called it-"MeCleanEm"

[GoldenNugget]

Originally Posted by Sterna

They should have called it-"MeCleanEm"

Yeah ...no kidding!

Also, only the locals would understand the cryptic language.

GN

[quantum_blast]

Trying to decode..

This whole statement is more likely than not a diversion of attention from the main problem in the system (a negative cash flow).

The technical team had worked all night to try and get us an alternative connection but as you could imagine being here in Vanuatu has its problems with isolation and limited contact when there are problems.

We have all kind of problems (legal, technical, understaffed) and there is a very limited amount of hard cash to deal with them effectively. Expect more delays.

You will notice that over the last six months that we have moved decisively towards refining the area of the accounts and eliminate the possibility for users to not misinterpret or misunderstand what the service are about.

We have wiped off all the excessive cash from all DXS users, thus only few if any can use their money in the portfolios (who needs portfolios nowadays as they represent only screen numbers, not real assets).

We're taking advantage of the downtime to change the overall system's setup that will help the full services to operate better

We have made all the critical cuts that were possible at this time. This means, no support stuff, and all services and office expenses cut down to minimum.

now that we have finally achieved the commercial target we have been aiming for so long.

As the patience has completely dried up from our end users and from the local government, we await for:
1. a miracle 2. just leave us alone (you have said that you had enough - we can honestly say the same)
3. just wait and see (embattled members will more likely to settle for less if anything at all)
4. as we have survived that far, who cares what happens next (Vanuatu, or some other place, is anybody getting bored here.. it looks like we are the last ones still around..)

We have always said that the accounts and portfolios were only a small part of the system and that the main system is about the commercial aspect or projects and where users will be able to have a continued benefit by using the services in the intended manner.

Now that we can forget about the portfolios, lets experiment with something else, shall we
(this whole thing does not make sense even to us but we are willing to listen, just give us enough money and eventually we will come up with something in return, just don't ask when)?

[Sterna]

We're taking advantage of the downtime to change the overall system's setup that will help the full services to operate better

Now, that's funny. It wouldn't take much to make them operate better, except for the inxchange function.

[KoolAidMan]

Do you understand KAM how by when I was specifically talking about the leg of the table that I was not equating the entire table to my comparison with a stick? I agree that a stick is not equivalent to a table at all!

I should have answered this more strait up I guess. yes Palmer I understand. I never thought you were trying to say that a restaurant was the equivalent to DX. I thought that would be clear by the questions I was asking after I made the analogy remark. Why you are so caught up in the semantic is funny. I know you were comparing an aspect of DX to another type of business...

Analogy is when we say that part of X resembles Y; analogy has it's root in the Greek work analogia meaning 'proportion'. In analogy there is no replacement, only aspectual comparison, and implied in this is that if X resembles Y in certain states, there is a chance that other similar states will also be found.

http://members.ozemail.com.au/~ddiamond/analog.html