Wannabe and The Master - what do you know? - Page 2

themaster · #11 05-01-2005, 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clarice

So, wannabee, The Master and the rest of the FLO naysayers,

Been nearly a month now with YOUR search for the truth and what do you know now that you didn't know then. Diddly squat is what you know.

The thousands you expected to materialize to help you with your FLO bashing and investigation didn't come, did they?

The mods that you expected to come forward didn't, did they? Maybe a few but not many.

It's quiet, isn't it? Not all all like you thought it would be.

Even Pat wouldn't answer publicly about his FBI complaint.

People who might know things don't tell, do they? They understand.

Makes you wonder even more doesn't?

Wonder where everyone's gone? Even the blog stopped blogging.

Keep scratching your heads, someday you'll understand.

The last words from X were, "When we return sometime after the first of the year." The Feb/Mar thing was paraphrased by Debra from several emails she'd received from X and were never a quote from him.

He's doing what he said he would - just taking longer than expected. They had 2 years to get the Shuttle ready and it's not going to happen on time either. Delay's ocurr and no matter what public statement would be made by X, no one would be happy with it. So why bother. Besides, there is no one he can trust to send word through. Certainly, not Debra - she resigned publicly. When things were working fine and payments arriving on time every day for 7 months people still complained.

Clarice

Clarice,

What a silly post!

I think you must be losing your grip, don't you realise that another month has gone by without any word from Xavier and without any news about the PP.

You are asking the wrong questions to the wrong people, you should be asking, "Xavier, where is my money?"

One thing I do know is that you and your new master Quincy are intentionally misleading people over at GH. So where does that leave you when the truth does come out?

The "naysayer" title is wearing a bit thin these days Clarice you should replace it "truth seekers" which is a more accurate description.

TM

cal227 · #12 05-02-2005, 04:33 AM

I dont know, But I think there something missing in this forum, Its called MATURITY, I read here often, I feel everyone has a right to their own opinion, From expreience in FLO, For 7 months outexchanges were on time, Members including myself MADE MONEY, I beleve the only thing all of us can do is wait it out! We all heard about X lost 2 bank deals becouse authorities were brought into this, Now it is posted more of the same is going on, What do you stand to gain from all of this, You folks stand to loose everything and gain nothing! Furthermore if it did go to court YOUR FUNDS would be used to pay everyone excluding yourselves!And if everyone did get paid after all the court expenses we would receive but a small percent, Im sure the majority of us wants FLO to succeed, OK im done! Now I will sit back to see who fires the first shot. cal227

awty · #13 05-02-2005, 04:44 AM

Cal227 - if I may...
"You folks stand to loose everything and gain nothing!"

Lose 'everything'?
It's already gone, and there might be SOME chance of regaining SOMETHING, however small, through 'other means', some of which are being actively pursued. If you have reason to believe that something is actually going to happen, 'positive' wise, I'm sure that many would like to hear it, myself included!!!

Also - I've written a small bit a few days ago on why, most likely, any 'court recoveries' are small, and it's not entirely due to court/legal expenses, or 'government costs'. If you'd like more clarification, please let me know.

Just my opinion,
Jeff

*** By the way, FLO DID "succeed", as intended from the start... ***

pluggy · #14 05-02-2005, 10:18 AM

If I'd made a lot of money from FLO, I'd be keeping quiet about it....

BFPierce · #15 05-02-2005, 12:40 PM

Everytime wannabe tosses out another term of endearment, it's like fingernails down the chalkboard.

wannabe-exFFinvestor · #16 05-02-2005, 03:03 PM

Ah, Hawkeye, Hotlips (the original one, not the TV imitations) had nothing on me. You may have noticed, luv, that my terms of endearment, if you can call them that, are aimed at a select few particularly repugnant or twerpy types. The ones who insist on positivizing a total creep-conman, who gets his jollies from cheating people and then sitting back, reading about their rage and giggling.

What I cannot fathom is how these few individuals are still under the guy's sway. Some are just seriously brain-washed, some fervently and sincerely hope that their dreams are not dust and that Ex is for real, others have their own mean little agendas. I would not be surprised if Ex is not the only one of his gang reading and posting here. I would suspect that some of his associates ('cause he was not alone in this) also come around to have fun. And by associates, I don't mean Debra or the mods. I mean the guys in the backroom. The ones who put up at least part of the seed money for FLO and have shared in the profits.

Abe from WWSN · #17 05-04-2005, 02:55 AM

Where are the big money losers as Wannabe claims. Another month has passed and these thousands are still quiet. Again - I still say - Maybe they don't exist.

As X BS'd us so does Wannabe.

awty · #18 05-04-2005, 03:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Abe from WWSN

Where are the big money losers as Wannabe claims.

Wow. an amazing set of reading skills here...
Jeff

wannabe-exFFinvestor · #19 05-04-2005, 03:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by awty

Wow. an amazing set of reading skills here...
Jeff

My sentiments exactly, Awty. Our Abe - who - shall - not - be - associated - with - WWSN is a selective reader, and obviously has not selected to read the threads where members have reported losses. He doesn't want to see them, so he isn't looking at them or for them. This suits his particular brand of reality, and his particular agenda, which for some unknown and unfathomable reason consists in minimizing the negative impact of FLO.

The guy simply prefers to walk around feeling all hunky-dory about the whole thing, in his own little pink world where no one loses and Ex is the nicest guy on the planet and stories have happy endings for everybody.

awty · #20 05-04-2005, 03:40 AM

I may be wrong here, but I'm thinking that there's more than just an 'FLO Positive' viewpoint going on. L

Lemme think out loud for a moment... Why in the heck would anyone be interested in minimizing the negative, and trying to infer that there were no actual losses. Including trying to use the name that might infer other associations than are actually being claimed (WWSN?).

Who/what would stand to possibly benefit, and why? Worth a little thought, perhaps?

Hmmm..... ( I know what my answer is, what's YOURS? After all, it's YOUR opinion and judgement that should mean the most to you, not a posting by someone like me.)

As I've mentioned, don't look just at the writing, look for the reason behind it. (That applies to ANY and EVERYONE, myself included.)

Maybe just an opinion,
Jeff