Winning gap racing system?

[steegus]

another **** day!!!

[gdubsuk]

I am new to this part of the forum and a very keen forumite anything to do with Horse racing with over 60 years experience.

I was keen to follow up this system and am amazed the reaction to the proprietor and his lack of attention to his customers.

Here is what I read about the system on a site called 'What Really Wins Money'

"Having heard some good feedback regarding The
Winning Gap system I have tried to get some info
from the readers who bought the system (which has
been sold out) and from my questioning The Winning
Gap is similar to my price gapper idea where we look
for a short priced favourite in The Betting Forecast of
The Racing Post which has a significant and
noticeable gap between it and the 2nd favourite.

Here's an example:

625 BATH
BETTING FORECAST: 6/4 Rioliina, 4/1 Via Mia,
5/1 Wake Me Now, 11/2 Bold Ring, 8/1 Phoenix
Enforcer, 20/1 Erris Lady, Spinning Bailiwick,
Yanza.

Can you see the difference between the 6/4 and 4/1 is
noticeable? Now, knowing James Buswell's previous
work (you now know why Carol Vorderman retired
from Countdown - she had to spend all her spare time
trying to suss out his previous systems!) there will be
obvious complications to accompany these winning
gaps as he calls them (or price gaps as I have
christened them)

The value of the blog is that I can keep a diary of
qualifiers and their results. I have simply listed the
most obvious price gaps without going into any
further analysis (and there is much more that can be
done such as checking RPR, is the horse the postdata
selection, race type, distance, jockey/trainer
performance etc etc).

Here are the results for the last 2 days:

Starry Sky 1st 8/11
Once a Gulch 1st 9/2
Vilna 2nd 10/11
Holiday ****tail 1st 4/1
Olympic Dream 2nd 7/2
Thumbs up 2nd 7/4
Asker Tua 1st 4/11
Riolina 1st 3/1
Like for like 1st 6/5
Casual Garcia 1st 5/6
Galpin Junoir 1st 8/15
Tilsworth Charlie 5th 5/2
Le Toreador 4th 9/4
On our way 1st 2/1
Certain Promise 1st 4/6

Impressive stuff eh! If you have your Racing Post's then
check the races where these horses appeared and you'll see
the price gaps OR visit the blog at http://www.back-lay-
trade-horses-football.blogspot.com/ or at
http://www.whatreallywinsmoney.com/

Some of the price gappers (such as Once a Gulch)
drifted considerably. Now I don't know if this is just
coincidence that I have started on 2 days where
performance has been good, but I like the strike rate
and prices of some of the qualifiers.

I know The Winning Gap buyers had to sign a non-
disclosure agreement hence my questioning and the
dusting off of my Columbo raincoat!"


Hope you find this of interest

gdubsuk

[gdubsuk]

I am new to this part of the forum and avery keen forumite anything to do with Horse racing with over 60 years experience.

I was keen to follow up this system and am amazed the reaction to the proprietor and hiss lack of attention to his customers.

Here is what I read about the system on a site called 'What Really Wins Money'

Having heard some good feedback regarding The
Winning Gap system I have tried to get some info
from the readers who bought the system (which has
been sold out) and from my questioning The Winning
Gap is similar to my price gapper idea where we look
for a short priced favourite in The Betting Forecast of
The Racing Post which has a significant and
noticeable gap between it and the 2nd favourite.

Here's an example:

625 BATH
BETTING FORECAST: 6/4 Rioliina, 4/1 Via Mia,
5/1 Wake Me Now, 11/2 Bold Ring, 8/1 Phoenix
Enforcer, 20/1 Erris Lady, Spinning Bailiwick,
Yanza.

Can you see the difference between the 6/4 and 4/1 is
noticeable? Now, knowing James Buswell's previous
work (you now know why Carol Vorderman retired
from Countdown - she had to spend all her spare time
trying to suss out his previous systems!) there will be
obvious complications to accompany these winning
gaps as he calls them (or price gaps as I have
christened them)

The value of the blog is that I can keep a diary of
qualifiers and their results. I have simply listed the
most obvious price gaps without going into any
further analysis (and there is much more that can be
done such as checking RPR, is the horse the postdata
selection, race type, distance, jockey/trainer
performance etc etc).

Here are the results for the last 2 days:

Starry Sky 1st 8/11
Once a Gulch 1st 9/2
Vilna 2nd 10/11
Holiday ****tail 1st 4/1
Olympic Dream 2nd 7/2
Thumbs up 2nd 7/4
Asker Tua 1st 4/11
Riolina 1st 3/1
Like for like 1st 6/5
Casual Garcia 1st 5/6
Galpin Junoir 1st 8/15
Tilsworth Charlie 5th 5/2
Le Toreador 4th 9/4
On our way 1st 2/1
Certain Promise 1st 4/6

Impressive stuff eh! If you have your Racing Post's then
check the races where these horses appeared and you'll see the price gaps OR visit the blog at http://www.back-lay-trade-horses-football.blogspot.com/ or at
http://www.whatreallywinsmoney.com/

Some of the price gappers (such as Once a Gulch)
drifted considerably. Now I don't know if this is just
coincidence that I have started on 2 days where
performance has been good, but I like the strike rate
and prices of some of the qualifiers.

I know The Winning Gap buyers had to sign a non-
disclosure agreement hence my questioning and the
dusting off of my Columbo raincoat!


Hope you find this of interest

gdubsuk

[macracing2008]

I had it as 2 meetings today. Only one qualifying race in the early meeting. It was the 5th race. We would be quids in if this was a laying system.

[gdubsuk]

I am new to this part of the forum and avery keen forumite anything to do with Horse racing with over 60 years experience.

I was keen to follow up this system and am amazed the reaction to the proprietor and his lack of attention to his customers.

Here is what I read about the system on a site called 'What Really Wins Money'

Having heard some good feedback regarding The
Winning Gap system I have tried to get some info
from the readers who bought the system (which has
been sold out) and from my questioning The Winning
Gap is similar to my price gapper idea where we look
for a short priced favourite in The Betting Forecast of
The Racing Post which has a significant and
noticeable gap between it and the 2nd favourite.

Here's an example:

625 BATH
BETTING FORECAST: 6/4 Rioliina, 4/1 Via Mia,
5/1 Wake Me Now, 11/2 Bold Ring, 8/1 Phoenix
Enforcer, 20/1 Erris Lady, Spinning Bailiwick,
Yanza.

Can you see the difference between the 6/4 and 4/1 is
noticeable? Now, knowing James Buswell's previous
work (you now know why Carol Vorderman retired
from Countdown - she had to spend all her spare time
trying to suss out his previous systems!) there will be
obvious complications to accompany these winning
gaps as he calls them (or price gaps as I have
christened them)

The value of the blog is that I can keep a diary of
qualifiers and their results. I have simply listed the
most obvious price gaps without going into any
further analysis (and there is much more that can be
done such as checking RPR, is the horse the postdata
selection, race type, distance, jockey/trainer
performance etc etc).

Here are the results for the last 2 days:

Starry Sky 1st 8/11
Once a Gulch 1st 9/2
Vilna 2nd 10/11
Holiday ****tail 1st 4/1
Olympic Dream 2nd 7/2
Thumbs up 2nd 7/4
Asker Tua 1st 4/11
Riolina 1st 3/1
Like for like 1st 6/5
Casual Garcia 1st 5/6
Galpin Junoir 1st 8/15
Tilsworth Charlie 5th 5/2
Le Toreador 4th 9/4
On our way 1st 2/1
Certain Promise 1st 4/6

Impressive stuff eh! If you have your Racing Post's then
check the races where these horses appeared and you'll see the price gaps OR visit the blog at http://www.back-lay-trade-horses-football.blogspot.com/ or at
http://www.whatreallywinsmoney.com/

Some of the price gappers (such as Once a Gulch)
drifted considerably. Now I don't know if this is just
coincidence that I have started on 2 days where
performance has been good, but I like the strike rate
and prices of some of the qualifiers.

I know The Winning Gap buyers had to sign a non-
disclosure agreement hence my questioning and the
dusting off of my Columbo raincoat!


Hope you find this of interest

gdubsuk

[gdubsuk]

Hello all

I just wanted to apologise for the repitition in my original postings and to say how sorry I am that people have been let down when purchasing systems.

My experience is that system sellers rarely let their buyers down after all they want your money for buying their future systems. What I feel is not in dispute is the quality of the goods they are peddling!

gdubsuk

[frenzy382]

I didn't run the selection process today so no bets, but I take it from a previous comment.... All is not well?

[amolev]

Originally Posted by ggman

Yes this system is genuine and seems to work as advertised. I notice that the website is now closed so it is sold out and now off the market...the vendor did say it was limited so he's keeping his word.

It's a litle bit difficult at first to get to grips with but after going through it a few times it all fell into place and you can make daily selections very quickly. I'm very happy so far.

ggman,
At last I received the manual, but I must say that in spite of reading it several times I am unable to find selections.
yet I don't think I am that dumb!
If only the author had provided several examples to illustrate his "GAP"cases !
So, as you seem to have grasped this stuff, could you please help me, by say giving me an example of each case for the next days.
I can give you an-e-mail if you like.
( not an answer to my e-mails from the author....)
Also, do you believe the results at the end of the manual are true?
Thanks,
amolev

[Speedy123]

Originally Posted by amolev

ggman,
At last I received the manual, but I must say that in spite of reading it several times I am unable to find selections.
yet I don't think I am that dumb!
If only the author had provided several examples to illustrate his "GAP"cases !
So, as you seem to have grasped this stuff, could you please help me, by say giving me an example of each case for the next days.
I can give you an-e-mail if you like.
( not an answer to my e-mails from the author....)
Also, do you believe the results at the end of the manual are true?
Thanks,
amolev

Don't waste your time with it.The system doesn't work as you can see from this forum.

[Speedy123]

For what it's worth i think the 3 meetings qualify today.2 of them have no selections and the other 1 has 3 selections from what i can make out.Anyway i won't be backing any off them.