I just joined a few days ago. It looks real promising. I need to lose another 20 to 25 so I will report my results a month after I receive the products.
I just joined a few days ago. It looks real promising. I need to lose another 20 to 25 so I will report my results a month after I receive the products.
Thanks. You do know you're on a laxative diet, don't you? Ask your doctor before taking the products (show him/her the label), especially the "Flush" product. That is basically senna and is recommended for occasional use and for no more than 7 days. You planning on taking it for a month?
As you have purchased the product(s), you have been given a copy of the scientific research?
Thanks. You do know you're on a laxative diet, don't you? Ask your doctor before taking the products (show him/her the label), especially the "Flush" product. That is basically senna and is recommended for occasional use and for no more than 7 days. You planning on taking it for a month?
As you have purchased the product(s), you have been given a copy of the scientific research?
If it really is a laxative diet than it would be a great thing for me because people always tell me that I am full of crap
If it really is a laxative diet than it would be a great thing for me because people always tell me that I am full of crap
They tell me the same, to be honest. But you learn to ignore these things, don't you?
Thomas, you seem like a nice enough person, and obviously have a sense of humor. Can you explain to me (and I'm asking with genuine curiosity, not hostility):-
1. Why anyone in their right mind would want, in these economic circumstances, to join a newly-formed, pre-launching MLM company whose products are irritant laxatives that doctors have been warning people about for years, when the company's owners won't even disclose their identity so that prospective distribs can do any due diligence at all?
2. Aren't you worried that the company's mysterious owners might turn out to have some sort of horrendous reputation and litigation-history in the industry? I joked above that Tony Little might even be involved. Ok, only kidding: nobody would be stupid enough nowadays to join any direct sales company where he had any involvement, I don't seriously suggest that even Carola Wijas here would fall for that one, though God knows she joins some crap and does no due diligence at all, over and over and over again. But really: aren't you concerned, given the secrecy, that the owners could turn out to include someone of that sort of "standing"?
3. What do you really think the chances are that this company will still exist a year after launching, and on what information do you base your assessment of that?
Again, I'm asking seriously, and with a kind of twisted fascination in how people can make such decisions, and would really love to see your answers, if you're willing to reply! I even promise not be rude about them!
They tell me the same, to be honest. But you learn to ignore these things, don't you?
Thomas, you seem like a nice enough person, and obviously have a sense of humor. Can you explain to me (and I'm asking with genuine curiosity, not hostility):-
1. Why anyone in their right mind would want, in these economic circumstances, to join a newly-formed, pre-launching MLM company whose products are irritant laxatives that doctors have been warning people about for years, when the company's owners won't even disclose their identity so that prospective distribs can do any due diligence at all?
2. Aren't you worried that the company's mysterious owners might turn out to have some sort of horrendous reputation and litigation-history in the industry? I joked above that Tony Little might even be involved. Ok, only kidding: nobody would be stupid enough nowadays to join any direct sales company where he had any involvement, I don't seriously suggest that even Carola Wijas here would fall for that one, though God knows she joins some crap and does no due diligence at all, over and over and over again. But really: aren't you concerned, given the secrecy, that the owners could turn out to include someone of that sort of "standing"?
3. What do you really think the chances are that this company will still exist a year after launching, and on what information do you base your assessment of that?
Again, I'm asking seriously, and with a kind of twisted fascination in how people can make such decisions, and would really love to see your answers, if you're willing to reply! I even promise not be rude about them!
No offense...but all this coming from a person who is doing cash gifting? Which is illegal no matter what the cash leveraging website says. But of course I'm sure you would defend it most righteously, just as many who are involved with CNI would defend their choice to join. Not to mention it is a most legitimate business, albeit brand new...it's still legit with well known owners.
I would say that those who know who the owners actually are, also know the history of their previous companies, which are indeed most positive.
I would think it is twisted for one such as yourself to be presumptuous in thinking they know it all and would never make bad decisions in this particular economy. I guess it would be my twisted fascination to wonder how people could make such wise decisions, such as joining cash gifting schemes during good times or bad
They tell me the same, to be honest. But you learn to ignore these things, don't you?
Thomas, you seem like a nice enough person, and obviously have a sense of humor. Can you explain to me (and I'm asking with genuine curiosity, not hostility):-
1. Why anyone in their right mind would want, in these economic circumstances, to join a newly-formed, pre-launching MLM company whose products are irritant laxatives that doctors have been warning people about for years, when the company's owners won't even disclose their identity so that prospective distribs can do any due diligence at all?
2. Aren't you worried that the company's mysterious owners might turn out to have some sort of horrendous reputation and litigation-history in the industry? I joked above that Tony Little might even be involved. Ok, only kidding: nobody would be stupid enough nowadays to join any direct sales company where he had any involvement, I don't seriously suggest that even Carola Wijas here would fall for that one, though God knows she joins some crap and does no due diligence at all, over and over and over again. But really: aren't you concerned, given the secrecy, that the owners could turn out to include someone of that sort of "standing"?
3. What do you really think the chances are that this company will still exist a year after launching, and on what information do you base your assessment of that?
Again, I'm asking seriously, and with a kind of twisted fascination in how people can make such decisions, and would really love to see your answers, if you're willing to reply! I even promise not be rude about them!
I am not yet going to go at full force until I have tested the products. I hear different opinions but the only to get the full picture is to find out for myself.
I think she posted somewhere as her name being Alexa Smith.
She did, actually, because that's her name.
But that's not relevant to the fact that products are being sold here of a type from which many people have died, and claims of a clinical trial are being made by people who can't supply the details of them at all, apparently have no interest in commenting on that, and just don't seem to care about it at all. Is it me, or does that conjure up the image of a lot of red flags? Others certainly seem to think so, too, don't they?
And talking of people's names and identities and other forums (as Carola Wijas was), do you think she's ever going to answer the questions asked here or has she just run away from that conversation after unsuccessfully trying to conceal her identity? I suppose it's the kind of thing you end up doing when you have that sort of reputation? And I suppose that's the sort of reputation you end up having when you promote stuff like this without caring what's in it or who manufactures it?
But that's not relevant to the fact that products are being sold here of a type from which many people have died, and claims of a clinical trial are being made by people who can't supply the details of them at all, apparently have no interest in commenting on that, and just don't seem to care about it at all. Is it me, or does that conjure up the image of a lot of red flags? Others certainly seem to think so, too, don't they?
And talking of people's names and identities and other forums (as Carola Wijas was), do you think she's ever going to answer the questions asked here or has she just run away from that conversation after unsuccessfully trying to conceal her identity? I suppose it's the kind of thing you end up doing when you have that sort of reputation? And I suppose that's the sort of reputation you end up having when you promote stuff like this without caring what's in it or who manufactures it?
dang chill out woman...I was just letting her know you posted your name somewhere amongst this thread since she wanted to know it.
uh...I don't care to speculate or presume to know what she is thinking or going to do. I don't know her. Not my business. But from what I have read elsewhere..all the info. and clinical trials and what not will be on the new upcoming websites.
I don't care to speculate or presume to know what she is thinking or going to do. I don't know her. Not my business.
Yes, I can understand that a lot of people may be trying to distance themselves from her at the moment.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ladyv
all the info. and clinical trials and what not will be on the new upcoming websites.
So, just let me get this right: up until and including right now, you guys have been promoting these products, telling people that there's favourable double-blind clinical trial information, and of course you know that the products also refer on their labels to the scientific studies that have allegedly been done, and yet you openly don't actually have that information when asked about it, and you actually can't provide it to people who ask, and when the company is asked for it they can't provide it either?!
But you're still just carrying on regardless, as if there was nothing wrong or disturbing here at all, even though you know that some people have died from using products like one of yours?
Re: Cal Nutrasciences CNI - Irepcni.com
Re: Cal Nutrasciences CNI - Irepcni.com
Hybrid Mode
