Your Money, Patience & Trust Get Paid Handsomely Here

[shawnlim88]

Dear ShipDit,

if you are able to read chinese, and do a baidu search on SMICAP, more info there.

[Yeo CH]

Originally Posted by shawnlim88

Dear ShipDit,

if you are able to read chinese, and do a baidu search on SMICAP, more info there.

Shipdit at post #154 said his only language is English, which is his native language. Since he wants/likes to expose lies or scams, he should be aware that this world is multi-lingual. What one can't find in one's native language does not mean that one can't find in other languages!

Realizing his linguistic limitation in post #154 and not realizing his linguistic limitation in SCAM.com, he went about spouting things in bold and capital letters there. Can a well give sweet and bitter waters at the same time? Such is Shipdit.

Let's see whether he will go to SCAM.com and correct his limitation and wrong information himself. Give him some time and if he didn't, I'll go there to correct.

Shipdit also jumped hastily into ... thinking that 103871 accounts = 103871 members. If I were him, I would have quoted exactly without changing accounts to members. This is so simple basic things any champion should know!

Wait and see what Shipdit will do next.

[Yeo CH]

Well, one of the latest account ID is 104394. See below screen-shot which was taken several minutes ago.



Many new accounts are being created daily even when the value of the tokens may dip 1 or 2 or 3 cents from US$0.30ea.


Bye

[Yeo CH]

Originally Posted by shipdit

"Splitting", whether it is shares of a real company, shares of an imaginary company, "tokens", apples or oranges, does not increase the real value of anything. If I have 1000 shares in a company that is selling for $100/share I have something that is worth $100,000. If those shares are "split" 2-for-1, I then have 2000 shares that are worth $50/share ... worth $100,000. The "splitting" of the tokens may increase the number that are available, but it has no effect on their value (assuming that there are buyers that believe they have any value).

I wish to discuss the above comment made by him at post # 154. Other comments by him in post #154 will be discussed later.

I've shown that splitting has been applied by financial guys in financial stuff (eg., trust funds) in three wrong price trends. Many financial guys, before Sep 2007, did not see MUCH BEAUTY to price-split when the price is ascending. Then, many financial guys applied price-split on slow- or non-moving or negative- price trend. I've shown in this thread that price-splitting done on these 3 trends as 50% chance in achieving subsequent increase in value.

In SMICap, the price-split is only done when the price is ascending. The BEAUTY to do so is that participants not only get more tokens qty accordingly to the ratio of split, the value also will go up again from the new base value, because it is an ascending price trend.

So, from 1000 tokens at US$0.40 ea = US$400, the split resulted in 2000 tokens at US$0.20 ea (new base value) = US$400 at a new growth cycle.

The value will go up to US$0.40 ea sooner or later in the new growth cycle. So, at the end of the growth cycle, it is 2000 x US$0.40 ea = US$800. And, at least 1 new growth cycle each year.

So, repeat the cycle to the next year, it becomes 4000 x US$0.20 ea at the start of new cycle. It becomes 4000 x US$0.40 ea = US$1600 at the end of the new cycle.

Repeat the cycle to another year, it becomes 8000 x US$0.40 = US$3200 at the end of another year. From US$400 ... it becomes US$3200 with patience

This is what participants in the tokens program are experiencing yearly, sooner or later, with patience.

Fact is fact. Figure is figure. Formula is formula. Mathematics is mathematics. Not the anti-rhetorical claim of, nor the mathematical extrapolation that, "by nth turn, the members are more than the world population!". Sorry, we are not talking about members. We are talking about growth in the no. of accounts, in one's tokens qty and in one's money.

ShawnLim has posted that there is/are mechanism(s) to ... that the value of the tokens goes up and Up and UP, sooner or later, during each growth cycle.

Calebjor has posted his first experience with the increase of his money with the tokens program.

I have shown my gains since 29 Jul 2008 with this more than 3.5 years program. I have said that this program will go into decades.

[Yeo CH]

While I was walking home last evening I was thinking of the following observations.

Programs....................New HYIP Investors..............Senior HYIP Investors
Last less than 1 year.... Cry foul cry scam .............. Smile - exit strategies work
Last 1 - 2 years........... Some smile some cry ......... Smile - exit strategies work
Last >2 but <3 years.... Rare ................................ Rare
SMICap >3.5 years....... ?????? ............................. Cry scam

When SMICap's tokens program is still going on and has come to India, Italy and Germany.


Bye

[shawnlim88]

Dear Yeo,

Originally Posted by Yeo CH

When SMICap's tokens program is still going on and has come to India, Italy and Germany.

thanks for sharing that SMICAP has gone into India & Germany.
i thought it has only gone to Italy.

SMICAP rocks...

[Yeo CH]

More accounts being created ... buying interest is so strong even though the value still hovers at US$0.29 ea and US$0.30 ea.

[Yeo CH]

Some people were grumbling why or how the value of the tokens could increase and couldn't get straight answers. They forgot that scammers are also learning from this forum how the tokens program could last much longer than their scams. To give straight answers are ... teaching wrong people.

Instead, grumbling people should become sharper in their learning - from the images and phrasings being posted here, rather than harping about "ignoring".

Now, the below screen-shot shows 102 buy orders being input on 2 Dec 2010 and being queued time-sequentially to buy various tokens qty at US$0.29 ea.



Look at the below screen-shot which shows 102 sell orders being input on 30 Nov 2010 and 1 Dec 2010, to sell the tokens all at US$0.30 ea.



Not shown in the above screen-shot are sell orders at US$0.31 ea, US$0.32 ea, ... US$0.40 ea ... US$0.45 ea ... US$0.50 ea.

Now, the value of the tokens will reach US$0.31 ea NOW, instead of hovering at US$0.29 ea and US$0.30 ea presently, if all those accountholders of the 102 buy orders adopt the right way of buying the tokens. Instead of queuing to try to buy at US$0.29 ea, they just buy the tokens according to the value of the first sell order appearing in the selling queue.

Got it?

(I couldn't see the screen-shots while I write this post - so, in case the screen-shots didn't turn up, I shall re-post again).


Bye ... it is past 12:14am in S'pore.

[shawnlim88]

dear Yeo,
yes, this is the concept that the CEO, Simonn Ng, has been telling during training.

Buy high, sell high high.
but high, high, sell high high, high

not many people can accept it.

thanks for sharing
shawnlin88

[Yeo CH]

Originally Posted by shipdit

...
If "the value of the tokens has remained between US$0.28ea and US$0.30 for more than 1.5 months", it is most likely a sign that demand for this Ponzi SCAM is tapering off already. I would recommend that anyone with any money in this scheme do everything they can to get some of their money back now, before SMICap and their anonymously-registered website are nowhere to be found.

Remember the above comment at post #154?

Now, the value of the tokens is approaching US$0.31ea. See the below screen-shot taken an hour ago.



Once the value crosses US$0.30ea, it will move fast to ... US$0.35ea ... to US$0.40ea.

Once the value crosses US$0.40ea, it will move very fast.

***You can check this movement by going to the earlier pages of this thread, where I posted screen-shots of each 1-cent increase until the tokens program price-split at US$0.51ea.

Back in the second half of 2009, the value of the tokens also hovered at US$0.28 - US$0.30ea for a long time. No fear, the system has mechanisms so that the value of the tokens will go up, Up and UP, according to demand and supply!

Originally Posted by shipdit

If I start a "company" selling imaginary "tokens" that are available in 11 different colors, would I be any more or less legitimate than SMICap?

NO, offering different colors will just give away that such is a scam program. Scammers will put forth 11 different shares/virtual companies - to look/sound more professional. Scammers will at least put forth 2 different shares/virtual companies, to look/sound like giving people a choice, but in fact for the scammers to manipulate, to switch/shift about ... .

For SMICap, it just has 1 tokens program.

Originally Posted by shipdit

Stockgeneration "enriched every participant at the same time" also ... until their Ponzi SCAM collapsed.

I read that Stockgeneration had/could have switched investors' shares to lesser 'profitable' virtual companies. So, it was not "enriched every participant at the same time" because Stockgeneration could switch/shift around to lesser 'profitable' ones.

For SMICap, because it just has 1 tokens program, there isn't any else to and it cannot switch/shift around. So, every account with SMICap, even those inactive accounts, was enriched equally at the same time upon every price-split.

Just 1 program ... got it?